One of the most common questions clients ask is what happens once the desk-based assessment has been submitted. The answer depends on the findings and on the sensitivity of the site, but there is usually a clear sequence: either the DBA provides enough information on its own, or it informs the next archaeological step. Understanding that sequence helps applicants plan ahead instead of treating archaeology as an open-ended mystery.
Possible outcomes after the report is reviewed
The local authority or archaeological adviser will consider whether the desk-based assessment gives enough information to support a planning decision.
- On lower-risk sites, the DBA may be accepted as sufficient with no further archaeology work required.
- On moderate or uncertain sites, the next step may be an archaeological evaluation to test the potential identified in the desk study.
- On some consented schemes, archaeology may be dealt with by condition, leading later to a Written Scheme of Investigation and fieldwork.
- Where the assessment highlights setting issues as well as buried remains, design changes may also follow before determination.
How the next stage is usually chosen
The decision is based on the character of the site, the level of evidence available and the scale of the proposed disturbance.
- If the desk evidence strongly suggests important remains but their survival cannot be confirmed, trial trenching or evaluation may be recommended.
- If the proposal affects only limited ground and risk appears manageable, monitoring or a watching brief may eventually be enough.
- If the layout can be changed to avoid a sensitive area, the project team may revise the design instead of moving straight to fieldwork.
- The DBA acts as the evidence base that helps justify whichever route is taken.
Why clients benefit from understanding the sequence
Projects move more smoothly when archaeology is understood as a staged process rather than as an unpredictable obstacle.
- Knowing the likely next step helps with budgeting, consultant coordination and contractor expectations.
- It reduces the risk of unrealistic programme assumptions after planning permission is granted.
- It allows architects and planners to keep design discussions open where archaeological constraints may influence the final scheme.
- It also helps applicants respond calmly if the authority asks for more than the desk study alone.
Frequently asked questions
Does a DBA always lead to trial trenching?
No. Some projects end at desk stage, while others move on to evaluation or conditioned mitigation depending on the evidence.
Can planning be approved before archaeology is finished?
Sometimes. Archaeology may be dealt with before determination or secured by condition, depending on the site and the local authority’s approach.
Who prepares the next stage if it is needed?
Usually the same or another suitably qualified archaeology consultant prepares the next document or fieldwork programme.
Need advice on this type of project?
AS Archaeology & Heritage Services can guide clients from desk-based assessment through to WSI, evaluation, watching brief or excavation if later stages are required.
Related links: Desk-Based Assessments | Written Scheme of Investigation | Archaeological Fieldwork